Current:Home > ContactSupreme Court rebuffs Biden administration plea to restore multibillion-dollar student debt plan -Quantum Capital Pro
Supreme Court rebuffs Biden administration plea to restore multibillion-dollar student debt plan
View
Date:2025-04-14 21:03:52
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday kept on hold the latest multibillion-dollar plan from the Biden administration that would have lowered payments for millions of borrowers, while lawsuits make their way through lower courts.
The justices rejected an administration request to put most of it back into effect. It was blocked by 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In an unsigned order, the court said it expects the appeals court to issue a fuller decision on the plan “with appropriate dispatch.”
The Education Department is seeking to provide a faster path to loan cancellation, and reduce monthly income-based repayments from 10% to 5% of a borrower’s discretionary income. The plan also wouldn’t require borrowers to make payments if they earn less than 225% of the federal poverty line — $32,800 a year for a single person.
Last year, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority rejected an earlier plan that would have wiped away more than $400 billion in student loan debt.
Cost estimates of the new SAVE plan vary. The Republican-led states challenging the plan peg the cost at $475 billion over 10 years. The administration cites a Congressional Budget Office estimate of $276 billion.
Two separate legal challenges to the SAVE plan have been making their way through federal courts. In June, judges in Kansas and Missouri issued separate rulings that blocked much of the administration’s plan. Debt that already had been forgiven under the plan was unaffected.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling that allowed the department to proceed with a provision allowing for lower monthly payments. Republican-led states had asked the high court to undo that ruling.
But after the 8th Circuit blocked the entire plan, the states had no need for the Supreme Court to intervene, the justices noted in a separate order issued Wednesday.
The Justice Department had suggested the Supreme Court could take up the legal fight over the new plan now, as it did with the earlier debt forgiveness plan. But the justices declined to do so.
veryGood! (12)
Related
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- BET Awards 2023: See the Complete List of Winners
- White House targets junk fees in apartment rentals, promises anti-price gouging help
- Fires Fuel New Risks to California Farmworkers
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- A lawsuit picks a bone with Buffalo Wild Wings: Are 'boneless wings' really wings?
- Inside Clean Energy: Which State Will Be the First to Ban Natural Gas in New Buildings?
- Judge rejects Trump's demand for retrial of E. Jean Carroll case
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Facebook parent Meta slashes 10,000 jobs in its 'Year of Efficiency'
Ranking
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- $58M in federal grants aim to help schools, day care centers remove lead from drinking water
- As Biden weighs the Willow oil project, he blocks other Alaska drilling
- 16 Michigan residents face felony charges for fake electors scheme after 2020 election
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Former Wisconsin prosecutor sentenced for secretly recording sexual encounters
- Is it Time for the World Court to Weigh in on Climate Change?
- U.S. arrests a Chinese business tycoon in a $1 billion fraud conspiracy
Recommendation
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
There were 100 recalls of children's products last year — the most since 2013
Louisiana university bars a graduate student from teaching after a profane phone call to a lawmaker
New drugs. Cheaper drugs. Why not both?
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Facebook parent Meta slashes 10,000 jobs in its 'Year of Efficiency'
A Clean Energy Milestone: Renewables Pulled Ahead of Coal in 2020
The truth is there's little the government can do about lies on cable